HP 700-029eb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 700-029eb  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 14:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 505
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 68.2
56% 71 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 68.3
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 417 438 451 451 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 456
Mixed 435
SusWrite 403
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 42.9
144% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 290
236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-029eb Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 700-029eb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback