Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 11:57
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 858
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 145
Parallax 134
106% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 122
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 1TB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 258 268 284 175 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 423
Mixed 305
SusWrite 249
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 34.4
142% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 135
159% 276 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 114%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
196GB free
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 326 407 411 436 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 464
Mixed 429
SusWrite 400
99% 437 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 44
155% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 298
218% 281 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
233GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 169 165 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 120
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 166
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
212GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 184 181 186 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 111
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 180
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
849GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 90 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 89.4
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 86.7
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 84%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
20GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 101
Write 16.4
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 16.2
36% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
53% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 27.3
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 27.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $830
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback