Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 11:02
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,046
94% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 144
Parallax 133
106% 136 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 1TB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 363 362 226 388 241 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 428
Mixed 358
SusWrite 309
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 40.4
134% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 254
215% 315 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 114%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
125GB free
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 416 408 439 426 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 433
Mixed 397
SusWrite 395
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 39
140% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 300
220% 286 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
161GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 153 153 154 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 76
SusWrite 152
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
212GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 134 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 158
Write 165
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 135
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
822GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 89 87 89 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 64.2
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 87.5
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 84%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
300GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 54.4
Write 30.5
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 34.1
46% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 75%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00A8LB0 1TB
122GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 56.5
Write 26.7
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 4.6
33% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 27.4
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 29.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback