Lenovo 20JNCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20JNCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20JNCTO1WW
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 10:33
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 74
2-Core 128
54% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 184
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2246) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 6.1
4% 7.5 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM4PS7256G 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 317 317 353 371 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 432
Write 373
Mixed 334
SusWrite 303
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 17.4
91% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 33.5
80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 96%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
415GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 340 339 380 440 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 427
Mixed 368
SusWrite 378
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 41.6
135% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20JNCTO1WW Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20JNCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback