Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 168
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 462
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 6.2
0% 11.8 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 86 83 82 84 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 453
Write 327
Mixed 338
SusWrite 93.3
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 27.2
90% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 227
189% 275 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 117 118 118 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 77.3
Write 122
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 118
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback