Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory247 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 731
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 3,255
202% 3,255 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1485 MHz, MLim: 1760 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 64.6
52% 66.9 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 57.2
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.16.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,710
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,506
360% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 48.5
175% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 90.6
203% 422 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
326GB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 109
Mixed 76.8
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
884GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 101
Mixed 84.6
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 77
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 72.3
Mixed 86
65% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LVM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 56.6
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
931GB free
Firmware: 1A05
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12,694
Mixed 76.7
4,565% 6,385 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: A3J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 32.8
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
488GB free
Firmware: LXM4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.8
Write 128
Mixed 91.4
74% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
92GB free
Firmware: 0B80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 140
Mixed 95.3
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
989% 8.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback