Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 22:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 193
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 296
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 130
Parallax 123
97% 124 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 128
Splatting 111
92% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 162 84 48 71 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 435
Write 327
Mixed 330
SusWrite 91.7
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 34.4
131% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 197
173% 255 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
138GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 106 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 96.1
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 108
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMD8GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMD8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback