| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 11.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '23 at 15:55 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 93% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.1%
Above average
|
58% 97.9 Pts
|
29% 222 Pts
|
15% 244 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
|
23.3%
Poor
|
23% 32.6 fps
|
23% 28.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 96 47 66 51 35 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
36% 159 MB/s
|
57% 18.1 MB/s
|
35% 65.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
877GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 186 188 196 199 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
104% 143 MB/s
|
170% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
28.8%
Poor
|
28% 9.8 GB/s
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 189 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 15x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |