TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 151
2-Core 287
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 570
63% 499 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 85%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 9.5
6% 9.37 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 12.8
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 7.38%
 Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 282
Parallax 213
202% 248 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 158
Splatting 130
142% 180 fps
Poor: 139% ↑
This bench: 166%
 Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 473
Mixed 346
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 42.5
162% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 283
233% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
223GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 489
Mixed 322
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40.7
154% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 69.2
127% 251 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 124GB
30GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.3
Write 3.2
Mixed 1.7
6% 7.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.2
67% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G4D26AFTA.8FADG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2473 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 25.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 23.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 81.4%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel  $248Bench 84%, 712,312 samples3,748x
Core i5-7600KIntel  $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples1,455x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples627x
GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples1,159x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples876x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples822x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples375x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples348x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples241x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples772x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples330x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples161x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $827
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback