Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 13:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 96.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 183
76% 127 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 495
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2989) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Lighting 80.8
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 81.5
66% 84.7 fps
MRender 75.7
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 71.8
62% 76.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 435 425 474 478 477 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 437
Mixed 374
SusWrite 452
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 41.8
140% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 368
274% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 21.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback