MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A58
MotherboardMSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 628
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,846
Write 1,688
Mixed 678
310% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 52.3
174% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 809
602% 804 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 93 98 87 89 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 61.7
Write 85.7
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 97.1
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
110% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 150 140 148 135 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 126
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 141
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 110%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 121 119 122 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 114
Write 97.4
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 119
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58) Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback