MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A58
MotherboardMSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 22:40
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 230
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 552
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Zotac(19DA C612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 298
Parallax 204
197% 248 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 178
Splatting 151
156% 198 fps
Poor: 147%
This bench: 167%
Great: 172%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 232
Parallax 138
111% 168 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 141
Splatting 127
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 615 173 131 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,027
Write 353
Mixed 649
SusWrite 216
124% 561 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 51.2
179% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 496
424% 628 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 140%
Great: 302%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 94 96 96 87 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 60.8
Write 91.4
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 93.3
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 157 154 137 140 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 131
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 145
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 110%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 121 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 72.3
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 120
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
197% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58) Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback