Asus PRIME B360M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive16.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360M-A  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 21:04
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 606
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.1
6% 7.47 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 0.1
4% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 256GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 42 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.8% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 41.4
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 39
9% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 11.5
39% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 16.2
12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 83%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0407
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 38.6
Write 41.7
Mixed 39.5
9% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 13.2
45% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 16.2
12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNI-L2B0B 256GB
190GB free
Firmware: 11710C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 429 418 429 441 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,126
Write 1,654
Mixed 1248
SusWrite 458
253% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 70.7
238% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,008
763% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 192%
Great: 210%
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L5B0B 256GB
181GB free
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 350 354 349 347 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 666
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 383
195% 879 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 45.6
202% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 450
416% 627 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 171%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-110.A00G 9905678-105.A00G 9905678-138.A00G 9905678-138.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B360M-A Builds (Compare 7,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-A - $495

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback