Asus GD30CI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GD30CI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 18:46
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 206
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 576
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 60.3
52% 63.1 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 59.7
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 255 253 253 255 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 476
Write 273
Mixed 230
SusWrite 248
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 38.4
126% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 251
204% 294 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 111%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
218GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 182 173 177 175 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 382
Write 320
Mixed 339
SusWrite 188
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 32
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 168
158% 242 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 100%
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS500 500GB
244GB free
Firmware: 1100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 1247 1240 1291 804 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1502
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 984
286% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 27.8
124% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 385
319% 453 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 179%
Great: 216%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
68GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 140 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 161
Write 157
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 141
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
228GB free, PID ce15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 35.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 36.7
46% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 859B CT16G4DFD824A.M16FJ 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback