Acer Aspire A514-51G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A514-51G  (all builds)
MotherboardWL Raichu_WL
Memory15.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190115
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 18:42
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 120
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 266
28% 227 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Acer(1025 130C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 7.7
6% 9.6 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 11
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 1228 778 789 795 795 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 1,699
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 896
324% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 63.7
207% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 628
456% 600 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 216%
Great: 346%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
741GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 136 141 135 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 20GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-51G Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-51G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback