HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 17:59
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 120
53% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 367
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5470
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08735
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 130 53 53 54 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 414
Write 393
Mixed 366
SusWrite 123
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 27.4
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 194
144% 186 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
172GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 115 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 115
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
25GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 83 84 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 67.6
Write 62.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 84.2
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB Samsung M393B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.9% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 40 60 19.2" 1280 720 DELA028 DELL E198FP
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback