Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 17:41
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$296
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 1,078
88% 768 Pts
64-Core 2,452
152% 2,452 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Palit(1569 2488) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 196
Parallax 203
174% 204 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 124
119% 149 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0323A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,635
Write 1,588
Mixed 1,044
316% 1,422 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 22.8
176% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 466
438% 676 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
886GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 144
Mixed 78.8
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
21GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 13
Mixed 24.8
40% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.9
131% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 4000 C20 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 46.1
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 26.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 UD DDR4 Builds (Compare 5,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback