Zoostorm 9876-3526A

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	Zoostorm 9876-3526A (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20160523
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '23 at 13:11
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$133 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 220 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 306 41% 307 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 91.9 Reflection 88.2 Parallax 77.3 75% 85.8 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 78.6 Splatting 70.9 59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R024G SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 351 379 370 410 352 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 437 Write 417 Mixed 357 SusWrite 337 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 33.2 125% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 180 151% 211 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 93%
Fanxiang S501 1TB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 490GB free Firmware: U0806A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 286 304 327 334 333 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 364 Write 327 Mixed 329 SusWrite 287 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 25 140% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 271 222% 318 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 280%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 70 69 70 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 81.5 Write 84.3 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 68.3 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB 8,345 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.4% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 20.7 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 9876-3526A Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 47%

Yacht

System: Zoostorm 9876-3526A

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x
Core i5-6600Intel $133Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
S501 1TBFanxiangBench 219%, 253 samples	3x
S100 512GBFanxiangBench 89%, 25 samples	1x

RAM
KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 8,345 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16