Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHP (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '23 at 07:06
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 246 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 401 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 38.7 31% 39.4 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 27.8 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Etopso 240GB 240GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 381 394 407 403 405 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 470 Write 402 Mixed 369 SusWrite 386 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 10.9 101% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 14.3 66% 146 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 80%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49 9,420 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 466GB free Firmware: MS1OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 190 190 189 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 187 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 189 101% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (90^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	360x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	288x
Core i5-9400Intel $160Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 4,742 samples	23x
BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 189 samples	16x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16