Lenovo 2756B36

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2756B36  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 20:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 173
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 297
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.1% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 30
Parallax 29
24% 29.4 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 20.6
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apollo 256GB 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 365 367 389 433 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 453
Write 381
Mixed 393
SusWrite 381
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 19.8
94% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 35.2
85% 171 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2756B36 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2756B36

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback