Asrock H370M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H370M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '23 at 18:17
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218 32,736 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 90.7 1-Core 145 2-Core 286 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 926 91% 745 Pts	64-Core 990 61% 990 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 5543) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.4% Good	Lighting 88.2 Reflection 87.8 Parallax 75.4 72% 83.8 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 79.2 Splatting 70.6 59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB 5,446 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEA1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 169 180 177 177 179 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 344 Write 184 Mixed 190 SusWrite 191 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 19.5 81% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 182 161% 238 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 100%
Hyundai 960G 960GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 265GB free Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 102 40 186 17 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 460 Write 379 Mixed 363 SusWrite 141 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 24.8 113% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 39.2 81% 158 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 42,084 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 23.1 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24.8 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370M-HDV Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock H370M-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	62x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	40x
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	27x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	17x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
P210 256GBPatriotBench 65%, 5,446 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16