Asrock H370M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H370M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 28 '23 at 11:48
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218 32,736 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 551 8-Core 899 89% 725 Pts	64-Core 972 60% 972 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 5543) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.2% Good	Lighting 87.9 Reflection 87.6 Parallax 75.8 72% 83.8 fps	MRender 65.1 Gravity 78.8 Splatting 70.6 59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB 5,446 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEA1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 75 166 173 82 236 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.3% Below average	Read 224 Write 112 Mixed 110 SusWrite 153 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 5.9 49% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 23.5 35% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 100%
Hyundai 960G 960GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 266GB free Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 394 141 16 260 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 471 Write 401 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 155 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 0.9 45% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 1 22% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 42,084 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.9% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.5 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 23 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370M-HDV Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock H370M-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	61x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	37x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	17x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
P210 256GBPatriotBench 65%, 5,446 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $379

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16