| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 09 '17 at 17:37 |
| Run Duration | 94 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.3%
Very good
|
74% 127 Pts
|
49% 364 Pts
|
23% 365 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
|
30.5%
Below average
|
31% 35.1 fps
|
30% 36.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-00000 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0200Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
56.7%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 194 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 - $79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 22x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $179 |