Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 11:30
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 188
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 331
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.6% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 63.8
42% 60.6 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 51.6
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 192 197 204 205 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 416
Write 175
Mixed 177
SusWrite 191
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 11.8
91% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 78.4
88% 147 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 78%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 127 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 124
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback