Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '23 at 11:22
Run Duration	1969 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 95.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 192 78% 132 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 342 37% 295 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 69.4 45% 60.2 fps	MRender 51 Gravity 55.3 Splatting 41.5 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$71 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 158 162 164 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 483 Write 388 Mixed 337 SusWrite 162 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 39.6 136% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 264 225% 330 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 130%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 54,201 User benchmarks, average bench 449% 791GB free Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 491 477 511 506 513 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1288 Write 1,186 Mixed 1,104 SusWrite 500 228% 1,019 MB/s	4K Read 51.2 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 59.2 202% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 833 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 671 526% 730 MB/s
Poor: 249% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 623%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 583GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 139 140 142 141 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 147 Write 147 Mixed 92.1 SusWrite 140 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 133 136 137 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 133 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 829GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 125 127 124 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 119 Write 89.6 Mixed 71 SusWrite 124 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 655GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 88 88 87 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 93.3 Write 63.8 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 86.8 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 84%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 3TB free Firmware: 0601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 152 161 156 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 188 Mixed 106 SusWrite 156 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 21.1 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 17.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 56 71% 56 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	185x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	161x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	134x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16