Lenovo 30D0SE2X00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30D0SE2X00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 314F
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 10:18
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$205
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,081
99% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 22.5
14% 22.7 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 25
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 426 424 422 422 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,048
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,260
SusWrite 426
304% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 69.7
233% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 911
661% 865 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 218%
Great: 279%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
141GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 466 398 283 284 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 468
Mixed 428
SusWrite 364
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 52.9
179% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
445GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 142 134 135 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 92.8
Write 109
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 135
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 106%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
447GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 37.9
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 41.7
48% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 0443 RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 8502 2666 C16 Series 24GB
2133, 2667, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30D0SE2X00 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30D0SE2X00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback