Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '23 at 13:43
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 44
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 88.1
35% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 142
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Device(1B0A 2281) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 11.4
10% 12.8 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 9.5
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green M.2 2280 480G 480GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42048100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 243 231 137 160 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 288
Write 259
Mixed 288
SusWrite 196
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 9.3
32% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 45.2
66% 125 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 9.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback