Asrock H510M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 18:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 721
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 392
Parallax 287
228% 319 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 236
Splatting 186
204% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 196%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Y200901a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 210 207 162 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 332
Write 207
Mixed 216
SusWrite 166
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 22.6
95% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 137
122% 183 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 99%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$94
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 153 154 154 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-HDV Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback