Dell Precision Tower 3620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 3620
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 3620  (all builds)
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 243
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 613
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.9% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 92.5
50% 71.5 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 44.4
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1TB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,295
Write 107
Mixed 174
111% 525 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 15.7
61% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 162
148% 238 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 262%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
930GB free
Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,416
Write 1,358
Mixed 1,047
284% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 49.1
175% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 213
193% 312 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
595GB free
Firmware: 0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,464
Write 27.1
Mixed 73.1
1,328% 1,855 MB/s
4K Read 512
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.8
21,897% 173 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
914GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5406
Write 30.6
Mixed 82.8
1,317% 1,840 MB/s
4K Read 608
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 6.1
26,061% 206 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.7
8% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 3620 Builds (Compare 3,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback