Acer Aspire A515-53

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-53  (all builds)
MotherboardWL Pikachu_WL
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 03:54
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 6.5
2-Core 10.2
4% 8.35 Pts
4-Core 14.9
8-Core 14.3
2% 14.6 Pts
64-Core 13.9
1% 13.9 Pts
Poor: 28% Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Acer(1025 130E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 5
3% 2.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
UL 128GB SSD 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 201 61 49 23 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.7% Very poor
Read 167
Write 212
Mixed 126
SusWrite 77.7
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 2.8
10% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
465GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 100 82 97 100 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 108
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 90.7
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 9905711-027.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 1.5
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 605
7% 605 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-53 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback