Eurocom Racer 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEurocom Racer 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM Racer 2.0
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 03:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 171
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 460
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 5281) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 38.5
24% 37.2 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 34
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 379 379 420 444 447 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 463
Write 410
Mixed 330
SusWrite 399
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 29.2
103% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 283
218% 297 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 133%
Indmem mSATA 512GB
442GB free
Firmware: Q0707A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 201 196 210 213 213 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 250
Write 206
Mixed 168
SusWrite 202
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 10.1
58% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 62.7
77% 134 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Racer 2.0 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Racer 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback