Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '17 at 06:02
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 731 80% 635 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 142 Parallax 124 101% 130 fps	MRender 98.8 Gravity 129 Splatting 110 92% 113 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,920 Write 637 Mixed 1,073 265% 1,210 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 28.1 150% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 41.6 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 26.2 45% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 49GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13526 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 554 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2896418215	102% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 402 Mixed 420 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 26.2 146% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 109 141% 255 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 9GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28481 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1299 (B1) Unknown 98 98 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 168 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4652788850	78.7% Very good	Read 492 Write 280 Mixed 315 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 18.7 124% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 37.3 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 19.5 50% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 170 7941 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4387 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13537 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 547 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 183 183 51777 (C2) HDA temperature 124 103 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.1% Good	Read 115 Write 122 Mixed 111 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.26 105% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 59,072 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 26.3 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 27.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,972x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	776x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	375x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	925x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	795x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	788x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	272x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	200x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	362x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	292x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	140x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,002

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359