Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 17:52
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 278
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 796
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 138
Parallax 121
101% 128 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 125
Splatting 104
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 722
Mixed 891
228% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 25
165% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 42
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 26.6
46% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 157%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 404
Mixed 419
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 24.7
133% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 22.7
58% 115 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
9GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 494
Write 281
Mixed 305
79% 360 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 18.8
121% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 18.5
89% 205 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 115
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.27
108% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 101%
WD My Book 1TB
60GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 35.7
Mixed 13.6
34% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.24
81% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 29
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,001
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback