HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 18:06
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 39.6
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 45.7
33% 49.4 Pts
4-Core 70.8
8-Core 116
11% 93.3 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8478) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 0.8
0% 5.73 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 225 164 224 224 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 1,130
Write 1,016
Mixed 538
SusWrite 286
165% 742 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 18.4
61% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 129
97% 130 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 226%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
458GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 89.6
Write 50.3
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 69.5
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 85F7 J641GU42J9266ND 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 18.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback