HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 06:09
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 46.1
24% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 78
8-Core 116
12% 97.1 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8478) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.1
0% 2.37 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 232 178 185 225 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 1,049
Write 1,020
Mixed 909
SusWrite 271
182% 813 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 17.7
59% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 95.7
DQ Mixed 131
96% 129 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 226%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
450GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 80 77 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 71.5
Write 48.4
Mixed 54
SusWrite 79.9
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 85F7 J641GU42J9266ND 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 19.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback