QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory15.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 15:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
CPU 0, 6 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 16.2
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 105
29% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 261
27% 219 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 64%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 81GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 78 60 59 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 89.9
Write 109
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 64.5
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 3.1
550% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 18GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 21.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 350
11% 350 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback