Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171018
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 14:04
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 574
68% 523 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 145
Parallax 140
114% 142 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 122
Splatting 111
108% 136 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 294 297 295 290 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 431
Write 311
Mixed 293
SusWrite 285
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 33
122% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 241
206% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
149GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 431 436 444 452 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 430
Mixed 397
SusWrite 438
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 49.7
165% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
139GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1175 1223 1245 1036 584 618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1241
Write 1,216
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 980
259% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 54.6
178% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,026
774% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 212%
Great: 349%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
653GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 111 100 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 110
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
122GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 58.4
Mixed 44
SusWrite 60.1
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$129
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback