Acer Predator PO3-640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-640
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 10:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 71.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 289
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 895
86% 706 Pts
64-Core 1999
124% 1999 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Sapphire(174B A630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 118
Parallax 123
104% 123 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.7
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 349 35 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Nvme Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
132GB free
Firmware: P6MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 114 295 113 113 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2D8HD-16F 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO3-640 Builds (Compare 1,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback