Lenovo 20Y1CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20Y1CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20Y1CTO1WW
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 74.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 813
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon PRO Graphics
Legend(17AA 5099) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.Q2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 18
Parallax 23.9
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 18.1
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 629 602 673 663 655 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1,070
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 642
236% 1,053 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 40
132% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 518
349% 433 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 154%
Great: 347%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 77.4
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 97.7
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 26
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20Y1CTO1WW Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20Y1CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback