Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '23 at 09:25
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700T 10 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 33.9 1-Core 40 2-Core 88.5 30% 54.1 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 321 28% 241 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 112 108 105 106 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.5% Very poor	Read 139 Write 127 Mixed 141 SusWrite 114 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 5.7 19% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 19.6 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 0.4 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16