Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210413
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 04:22
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 899
87% 717 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 18.4
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.1
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S70 B 2TB
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.2A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1705 2110 2171 2297 2297 2292 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,235
Write 2,263
Mixed 2114
SusWrite 2,145
494% 2,189 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 80.2
259% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1,159
DQ Mixed 1,262
946% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 357%
Great: 579%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
207GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 449 428 425 419 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 469
Mixed 394
SusWrite 433
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 32
120% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 295
217% 282 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94%
Great: 95%
M.2 Enclosure 2TB
24GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 787 780 799 781 738 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 59% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$198
979GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 184 184 184 184 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 96 97 96 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 104
Mixed 85
SusWrite 97.2
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
131% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 109%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
68GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 99 99 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 66.4
Write 69.8
Mixed 44
SusWrite 99
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA HDWD110 1TB
27GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 133 161 162 148 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 132
Write 146
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 149
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
43GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 173 111 111 118 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 167
Write 171
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 134
179% 136 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
163% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 24.9
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback