MSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C82
MotherboardMSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 03:03
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 844
86% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,035
64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 7C82) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.1 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HAJQ-000L7 512GB
456GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 442 445 435 404 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 465
Mixed 403
SusWrite 424
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 56.4
193% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$104
791GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 443 445 438 406 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 459
Mixed 346
SusWrite 428
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 49.7
176% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 256
218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 116%
Great: 120%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
954GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 445 450 439 406 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 454
Mixed 385
SusWrite 430
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 36.2
153% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
931GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 447 449 438 407 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 462
Mixed 445
SusWrite 430
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.3
192% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
387GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.9% Good
Read 42.3
Write 42.7
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 42.4
58% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 15.4
1,129% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 12.7
1,250% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82) Builds (Compare 2,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback