TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star GE63VR 7RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P1  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 03:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 210
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 559
60% 475 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 84.4%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11F7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 122
Parallax 95.6
79% 105 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 104
80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 79.2%
 Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1343 309 308 310 310 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,368
Write 1,444
Mixed 1,030
SusWrite 482
294% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 81.6
280% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 1232
DQ Mixed 995
780% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 260%
 Great: 280%
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
86GB free
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 405 420 437 436 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 374
Mixed 398
SusWrite 424
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 40.2
137% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 311
233% 310 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 26.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 88.9%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16P1 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples425x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples8x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples184x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples162x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples82x
SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples92x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples44x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $104Bench 235%, 154,949 samples19x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples65x
MSI24D4S7D8MH-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,184 samples56x
MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 20,148 samples46x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback