Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

12 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191204
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '23 at 23:18
Run Duration	345 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 67.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 74% 137 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 902 80% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,712 106% 1,712 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8665) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 165 Parallax 165 130% 163 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 144 Splatting 122 120% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	22% Poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 28.1 22% 28.5 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 28.7 23% 27.4 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,520 Write 2,242 Mixed 1,639 474% 2,134 MB/s	4K Read 58.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 75.6 248% 83.9 MB/s	DQ Read 910 DQ Write 605 DQ Mixed 823 596% 779 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 61GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 479 478 478 479 479 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 482 Mixed 373 SusWrite 478 103% 455 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 48 163% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 330 257% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 245GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2257 591 595 594 595 595 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2,524 Write 2,337 Mixed 1,624 SusWrite 871 411% 1,839 MB/s	4K Read 59.4 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 72.3 246% 83.6 MB/s	DQ Read 950 DQ Write 662 DQ Mixed 857 626% 823 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 10GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 506 Write 476 Mixed 356 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 40.1 142% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 269 218% 310 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB 2,217 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 60GB free Firmware: 42A2S8MA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,543 Write 2,191 Mixed 276 366% 1,670 MB/s	4K Read 56.5 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 75.9 251% 87.3 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 770 DQ Mixed 646 538% 777 MB/s
Poor: 187% Great: 382%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 28GB free Firmware: 01.01S01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 75 75 75 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 70.1 Write 65.1 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 75.5 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01S01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 131 131 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 144 Write 127 Mixed 110 SusWrite 130 95% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 8x8GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	MC Read 62.2 MC Write 57.4 MC Mixed 61.8 173% 60.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 37.3 SC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 192%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	115x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	20x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $167Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $983

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369