MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 14:42
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 249
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 804
74% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 128
Parallax 185
92% 142 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 124
Splatting 80.2
82% 102 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 879 888 895 881 870 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,323
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,623
SusWrite 920
391% 1,749 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 90.9
300% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,325
DQ Write 1,150
DQ Mixed 1,208
913% 1,227 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 298%
Great: 340%
Amd-raid Array 1 1.5TB
391GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 57 59 60 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 109
Write 163
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 56.8
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1
254% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 124%
Amd-raid Array 6 2TB
179GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 57 57 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42% Average
Read 90.4
Write 88.5
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 54.8
60% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
211% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42%
Great: 84%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
765GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 57 57 59 58 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 55.8
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 103%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
973GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.3
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 93.4
118% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.8
283% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 36.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 36.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback