Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 21:24
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 128
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 589
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.3% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 58
Parallax 78.6
49% 65.4 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 44.3
45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA004R07
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 369
Mixed 366
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 45
140% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 261
202% 276 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 113%
MLD M200 240GB
17GB free
Firmware: V0111A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 437
Mixed 363
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 19.4
133% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 49.2
99% 196 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 29.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 28.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback