Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '15 at 22:55
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 62
2-Core 119
56% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 266
31% 243 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 26.8
23% 26.3 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 30.2
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ PETROL 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.6% Below average
Read 210
Write 184
Mixed 203
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 6.54
46% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 6.55
14% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 55%
OCZ PETROL 256GB
49GB free
Firmware: 3.12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 55%
OCZ PETROL 256GB
49GB free
Firmware: 3.12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 522
Write 398
Mixed 491
105% 470 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 7.65
51% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 45.9
DQ Mixed 7.39
12% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 55%
OCZ PETROL 256GB
49GB free
Firmware: 3.12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback