Asus X555LA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555LA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LA
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 11:31
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 110
52% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 161
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 16CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 197 274 335 337 342 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 439
Write 348
Mixed 268
SusWrite 303
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 32.7
116% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 130
151% 263 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT41K512M8RH-125:E Kingston ASU16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LA Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback