Getac F110G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGetac F110G6  (all builds)
MotherboardGETAC F110G6
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
CUU5A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 53.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 243
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 583
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1071 E207) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 19
14% 16.9 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 13.5
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ25104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 392 511 278 267 247 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,723
Write 1,449
Mixed 1,063
SusWrite 473
262% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 35
139% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 270
195% 261 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 151%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2GSH64V2E 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F110G6 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Getac F110G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback