Illegear ARTE 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIllegear ARTE 14  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230318
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 12:21
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 207
2-Core 399
117% 227 Pts
4-Core 710
8-Core 1,047
110% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,564
97% 1,564 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Device(1D05 124C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 60.1
50% 63.2 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 55
44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSP445P441T-H06O200-H1 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 23323a06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1567 1663 1618 1720 1498 1114 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,768
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 1,530
349% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 58.8
194% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 674
488% 648 MB/s
Poor: 203%
This bench: 253%
Great: 405%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO580EA2-5200J 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
143% Outstanding
MC Read 64.3
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 53.4
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 26.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 143%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ARTE 14 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Illegear ARTE 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback